The case of State of Haryana v. State of Punjab (2002) relates to the completion of the Satluj-Yamuna Link Canal by the State of Punjab as it was agreed with the State of Haryana. The question regarding the meaning of dispute of river waters, the extent of jurisdiction and the role of the central government was subsequently discussed….…...
The case of Kuldip Nayar v. Union of India (2006) deals with the amendments to the Representation of People’s Act, 1951 where, initially it required for the electors to have a “domicile” in the State concerned for getting elected to the Council of States, which was subsequently deleted by the said amendment in 2003. And, with the introduction……...
This article on ‘What is supreme: Fundamental Rights or Directive Principles?’ is written by Meenakshi Chahar and aims at finding out whether Fundamental Rights are supreme or is it the Directive Principles that are supreme. I. Introduction | What is supreme: Fundamental Rights or Directive Principles? There is always a constant question that we need to find out:……...
This article on ‘The Deity’s House: a critical analysis of Sabarimala temple judgement.’ is written by Meenakshi Chahar and aims to bring out a critical analysis of the Sabarimala verdict. I. Introduction In a country like India, women have faced the problem of discrimination for centuries. Religion happens to be a greater influence on such discriminations. The personal……...
This article, ‘Time to Relook India’s Contempt Law‘ by Mudassir Hasan, a final year law student of Faculty of Law, Jamia Millia Islamia, focuses on the evolution of Contempt law in England, laws prevailing in India regarding Contempt, its flaws and in the end, the article focuses on the need to revisit the law. PM Modi once remarked……...
Question: Write a critical note on Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597. [UPJS 2012] Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [Write a critical note on Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India, AIR 1978 SC 597.] Answer In the present Maneka Gandhi Case, the petitioner, Maneka Gandhi was a journalist……...
Question: How far judicial decisions, interpreting constitutional provisions, relating to appointment and transfer of Judges have affected established principles of Constitutional Law? [UPJS 2006] Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [How far judicial decisions, interpreting constitutional provisions, relating to appointment and transfer of Judges have affected established principles of Constitutional Law?] Answer The……...
Question: Write a short note on the Rule of Law. [MPJS 2011] Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [Write a short note on the Rule of Law.] Answer The phrase ‘Rule of Law’ literally means that the law should rule, which means the law is superior to any other rule or ruler. The……...
Question: Describe the facts and circumstances of the following case: [RJS 1991] Kanu Sanyal v. State of West Bengal (AIR 1974 SC 1361) State of Rajasthan v. Union of India (AIR 1977 SC 1361) Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [Describe the facts and circumstances of the following case.] Answer Kanu Sanyal v….…...
Question: Describe the facts and principles of law laid down in Lakshmi Kant Pandey v. Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 469 [RJS 1988] Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [Describe the facts and principles of law laid down in Lakshmi Kant Pandey v. Union of India, AIR 1984 SC 469.] Answer Facts……...
© 2020 Legal Bites - Law And Beyond .
