ARCHIVE SiteMap 2021-09-16
At the trial of A for the murder of her husband, B by administering arsenic to him…B had, three days before his death, written a letter to a friend complaining of his failing health. Discuss fully whether the evidence offered is admissible in any of these cases.- A is accused of defaming B by publishing a statement. Whether the fact of previous publication of a similar statement by A against C is relevant?
- A is accused of defaming B by publishing a statement. Is the fact, that on a previous occasion also A defamed B by publishing a defamatory statement relevant?
- At the trial of A for the murder of her husband B by administering arsenic to him, the evidence is offered to show that A is in the habit of poisoning people. Discuss fully whether the evidence offered is admissible.
- A is facing trial for the murder of B by intentionally shooting him dead. Is the fact that A on other occasions shot at B relevant?
- X is charged with shooting at Y with intent to kill him. The prosecution wants to lead evidence to show that X had previously shot at Y.
- How are facts showing the existence of a state of mind relevant when the existence of such a state of mind in an issue?
- What facts are relevant to determine the right or custom in question?
National online criminal law quiz competition | Quiz Department of UILS, Punjab University
DU LLM 2018 Solved Paper | DU LLM Entrance Solved Papers PDF
National Essay Writing Competition organized by Think India CNLU
Job Opportunity for lead Counsel at Facebook