State whether and why the evidence sought to be adduced in the circumstances given below is relevant or not? M, accused of murdering A…wants to lead evidence that he was at Guntur on that day?by Admin Legal Bites 15 Sept 2021 8:14 PM IST
What is the Plea of alibi? Describe the nature and extension of its burden of proving? Explain the effect of its failure on the case of the prosecution.by Admin Legal Bites 15 Sept 2021 8:10 PM IST
Under what circumstances things said or done by conspirators in reference to common design are relevant?by Admin Legal Bites 15 Sept 2021 8:06 PM IST
Six appellants were convicted under Sections 395, 396 read with Section 397, I.P.C for having looted a passenger bus at about 11 p.m. on a moonless night and having caused the death of one passenger. The sole basis for their conviction was their identification by different PWs… What is the evidentiary value of such test identification?by Admin Legal Bites 15 Sept 2021 7:48 PM IST
An accused in a case of dacoity is produced before you by the investigating officer in a muffled face with a request for holding a test identification parade to fix his identity as a culprit. How will you deal with the application?by Admin Legal Bites 15 Sept 2021 7:26 PM IST
What is the Test identification Parade of the accused and its evidentiary value? Discuss with reference to relevant provisions of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, and Indian Evidence Act, 1872.by Admin Legal Bites 15 Sept 2021 4:55 PM IST
A is tried for the murder of B. Evidence is offered at the trial to show that A absconded after receiving a letter, warning him that the inquiry for the murder was being made. Discuss the relevancy of aforesaid facts.by Admin Legal Bites 15 Sept 2021 4:32 PM IST
At the trial of A for the murder of her husband B by administering arsenic to him, evidence is offered to show that A and B used to have frequent quarrels. Discuss fully whether the evidence offered is admissible?by Admin Legal Bites 15 Sept 2021 4:28 PM IST
What is the function of the Law of Evidence in judicial inquiries? What are the cardinal rules of that Law?by Admin Legal Bites 10 Sept 2021 11:11 AM IST
“Relevancy and Admissibility are neither synonymous nor is the one included in other.” Elucidate this statement.by Admin Legal Bites 10 Sept 2021 11:05 AM IST
A is prosecuted for the murder of B under Section 302 I.P.C. The prosecution proves the case beyond all reasonable doubts but it cannot prove the case conclusively. Is the accused entitled to the benefit of the doubt and liable to be acquitted?by Admin Legal Bites 8 Sept 2021 5:37 PM IST
‘A’ an accused is prosecuted for the murder of B. The evidence adduced before the trial court shows that there are 75% chances of committing the murder of B by A but 25% chances of not committing the murder of B by A. Presuming yourself to be a Sessions Judge (trial court), what would be your Judgement?by Admin Legal Bites 8 Sept 2021 5:26 PM IST
