Law of Torts Mains Question Answer Series 2: Important Questions for Exams | Part – II
Legal Bites presents the Law of Torts Important Question-Answer Series. The questions listed here will help students study for various Competitive and University Exams.
Legal Bites presents the Law of Torts Important Question-Answer Series. The questions listed here will help students study for various Competitive and University Exams. Candidates can use Legal Bites' list of questions to help them determine the most important and often asked questions and practice their aptitude and knowledge.
Answering questions is a continuous process that is an inevitable component of any test preparation, as we all know. A well-written response displays not just a candidate's knowledge but also his or her ability to tailor the content to the question's requirements.
It is vital to prepare for this exam to pass it thoroughly. To attain mastery over the subjects studied, applicants only need to keep practising these questions in the months coming up to the examinations. Following it, the candidate's confidence level, as well as their scores, will vastly improve.
Law of Torts Mains Question Answer Series 2: Important Questions for Judiciary Exams | Part – II
(b) A asks for a lift from a motorist B. A is told by B - "I am not an expert driver. I am without a driving licence too. You may travel at your own risk." A travels with B. Later, the motor vehicle collides with a bus due to defective breaks of B's vehicle. A sues B for injuries suffered by him in the accident. B takes the plea of 'volenti non fit injuria'. Decide, after discussing the whole law relating to the aforesaid maxim. [BJS 2021]
W a workman in a factory was returning home on his bicycle in the night when he rode over a live wire because of which he was electrocuted to death. The widow of 'W'brought an action for damages against the State Electricity Board claiming that the Board could not escape from its liability to pay damages as this was a case of strict liability. It was contended by the State Electricity Board that one person 'C'had taken a wire from the main supply line in order to siphon the energy for his own use and the said act was done without notice of the Board and that the line got unfastened from the hook and fell on the road over which the deceased rode the bicycle, accordingly liability could not be fastened on the State Electricity Board as the reason for the unfortunate incident was "an act of stranger".