"The keynote of the law of torts lies in wrong doing set in a civil, as opposed to a criminal, framework." Elucidate.

Question:  "The keynote of the law of torts lies in wrong doing set in a civil, as opposed to a criminal, framework." Elucidate. [BJS 1987]

Find the question and answer of Law of Torts only on Legal Bites. ["The keynote of the law of torts lies in wrong doing set in a civil, as opposed to a criminal, framework." Elucidate.]

Answer

Tort is a branch of private law. It focuses on interpersonal wrongdoing primarily between private persons. The law of torts is a branch of civil law that deals with wrongdoings or harm caused by one person or entity to another person or entity. It is different from criminal law, which deals with crimes that are considered to be harmful to society as a whole and can result in punishment, such as imprisonment or fines. Unlike the law of contract, tort obligations are not normally entered into voluntarily; unlike criminal law, the state is not necessarily a party to a tort action.

Private persons can often contract around the rights and obligations of tort law; those rights and obligations provide the background against which other private arrangements can be made. Prominent examples of torts include negligent injury, battery, deceit, and defamation. In each case, the existence of the legal right that has been violated does not depend on any prior act of the injured party. Instead, everyone has rights against these types of conduct on the part of others.

Tort law engages with two of the most fundamental questions of morality and social life: how people are permitted to treat each other, and whose problem it is when things go wrong.

The keynote of the law of torts is that it is based on a civil framework, which means that it focuses on resolving disputes between individuals or entities and compensating victims for harm caused to them, rather than punishing the offender. In other words, the primary goal of tort law is to provide a remedy for those who have been wronged or suffered harm, rather than to punish the wrongdoer.

Torts can take many forms, including negligence, intentional harm, strict liability, and defamation. Examples of torts include a doctor's failure to diagnose a patient's illness, causing harm to the patient, or a company's emissions that cause pollution and harm to neighbouring residents. In these situations, the law of torts provides a framework for individuals or entities to seek compensation for the harm that has been caused to them.

One of the key features of the law of torts is that it operates under a civil standard of proof. This means that in order to establish liability, the victim only needs to prove that it is more likely than not that the defendant caused the harm. This is a lower standard than the criminal standard of proof, which requires proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Another important aspect of the law of torts is the concept of damages. Damages refer to the compensation that the victim is entitled to receive as a result of the harm caused by the defendant. This can include compensation for medical expenses, lost wages, pain and suffering, and other damages.

The keynote of the law of torts is that it provides a civil framework for resolving disputes and compensating victims for harm caused by one person or entity to another person or entity. It is based on a lower standard of proof than criminal law and seeks to provide a remedy for those who have been wronged, rather than punishing the wrongdoer.

Examples of torts include negligence, defamation, nuisance, trespass, and intentional harm. Let's take a look at some examples and relevant case laws:

Negligence: Negligence occurs when a person fails to exercise reasonable care and their actions or inactions result in harm to another person or entity. An example of negligence could be a doctor failing to diagnose a patient's illness, resulting in harm to the patient. In the case of Donoghue v. Stevenson (1932), a woman found a decomposed snail in her ginger beer and suffered shock and gastroenteritis. She sued the manufacturer for negligence and the court established the principle of duty of care, which means that manufacturers have a duty to ensure that their products are safe for consumers.

Defamation: Defamation occurs when a person makes false statements that harm another person's reputation. This can take the form of libel (written) or slander (spoken). In the case of Reynolds v. Times Newspapers Ltd (2001), a politician sued a newspaper for publishing an article that suggested he had links to terrorists. The court established the principle of qualified privilege, which means that journalists have a duty to report on matters of public interest but must ensure that the information they report is accurate.

Nuisance: Nuisance occurs when a person interferes with another person's use and enjoyment of their property. For example, if a factory emits noxious fumes that make it impossible for a nearby resident to enjoy their property, this would be considered a nuisance. In the case of Sturges v. Bridgman (1879), a confectioner sued a doctor for opening a consulting room next to his shop, which caused vibrations and noise that disrupted his business. The court established the principle of the "coming to the nuisance" defence, which means that if a person moves to a property with knowledge of a pre-existing nuisance, they cannot complain about it later.

Trespass: Trespass occurs when a person enters another person's property without permission. In the case of Bernstein of Leigh (Baron) v. Skyviews & General Ltd (1978), a company flew a plane over a property to take aerial photographs. The property owner sued for trespass, and the court established the principle that landowners have airspace rights that extend to the height necessary for the ordinary use and enjoyment of their property.

Intentional harm: Intentional harm occurs when a person deliberately causes harm to another person. This can take the form of assault, battery, or false imprisonment. In the case of R v. Collins (1973), a man was charged with assault for pointing an unloaded shotgun at a group of police officers. The court established the principle that an act that causes fear in another person can be considered an assault, even if there is no physical contact.

• Law of Torts - Notes, Case Laws And Study Material
• Law Aspirants: Ultimate Test Prep Destination