Odisha Judicial Services Exam Mains 2019 Optional Paper - I | Law of Crime & Law of Torts
Candidates preparing for Odisha Judicial Services Exam should solve the Odisha Judicial Services Exam Mains 2019 Optional Paper - I (Law of Crime & Law of Torts) and other previous year question papers before they face Prelims and Mains.

Candidates preparing for the Odisha Judicial Services Exam should solve the Odisha Judicial Services Mains 2019 Optional Paper - I (Law of Crime & Law of Torts) and other previous years' question papers as part of their preparation for the Prelims and Mains. Practicing these papers helps aspirants understand the syllabus better and prepare strategically by focusing on the types of questions previously asked. Successful candidates are always aware of the question patterns and techniques employed by the Odisha Judiciary Examination. Every aspirant should adopt this approach at the start of their preparation to gain a comprehensive understanding of the examination pattern and question design.
Odisha Judicial Services Exam Mains 2019 Optional Paper- I | Law of Crime & Law of Torts
Practicing authentic question papers gives candidates a real sense of the exam pattern and question style. Below is the Odisha Judicial Services Mains 2019 Optional Paper - I | Law of Crime & Law of Torts. Strengthen your preparation with our Odisha Judiciary Mains Mock Test Series. | SPONSORED
Odisha Judicial Services Main Written Examination 2019
Optional Paper-I (Law of Crime & Law of Torts)
Optional Paper-I (Law of Crime & Law of Torts)
Maximum Marks: 150
The questions are of equal value.
Answer six questions, selecting three questions from each Section. All questions carry equal marks
Section - A
Question 1
It is said that mens rea is an essential element of an offence. Can mens rea be excluded from the definition of an offence? Explain referring to decided cases. (25 Marks)
Question 2
A attacks B. B has ample opportunity to save himself by running away from the scene. B, however, does not retreat and decides to defend himself. In the process, B causes injury to A. Was B validly exercising his right of private defence? Explain. Also point out the limitations of the Right of Private Defence. (25 Marks)
Question 3
“There may be a circumstance when a person is justified in doing a lesser evil in order to avoid a greater evil." Discuss in the light of Section 81 of the Penal Code. (25 Marks)
Question 4
Explain 'equivocality test' to determine attempt. Point out the difference between preparation and attempt. (25 Marks)
Question 5
"Every murder is culpable homicide but every culpable homicide is not murder." Explain, keeping in mind the scheme of the Penal Code in dealing with the two offences. (25 Marks)
Question 6
Five persons with intention to commit robbery proceeded towards the house of Z. The inmates of the household got the information and fled the house in panic. Five persons entered the house and took away the property without using any violence. Explain the offence committed by them. Will it make any difference had the inmates resisted them and all the five had to make a retreat without any property? Explain. (25 Marks)
Section - B
Question 7
What do you understand by 'Tortious Liability'? Is it 'law of tort' or 'law of torts'? Explain. (25 Marks)
Question 8
Explain the extent and scope of the doctrine of Volunti non-fit injuria in the law of torts. A is under an imminent danger created by the wrongful act of D. P, a stranger to A, intervenes to save A from the injury but injures himself in the process. Can P claim compensation from D? (25 Marks)
Question 9
What is meant by the term 'course of employment' for the purpose of determining vicarious liability of master for the wrongful act of his servant? Is the master liable for the act of his servant which the master had expressly forbidden his servant to do? (25 Marks)
Question 10
Discuss the two defences of justification and fair comment available to a defendant in an action for defamation. Explain and illustrate. (25 Marks)
Question 11
What do you understand by false imprisonment? A puts B in a room and locks the door from outside but leaves the second door of the room unlocked through which B can escape if he chooses to do so. Does this act of A amount to false imprisonment? Discuss. (25 Marks)
Question 12
Explain the rule of absolute liability laid down by the Supreme Court in M. C. Mehta v. Union of India (1987). In what respect does this principle differ from the rule laid down in Rylands v. Fletcher. (25 Marks)