Question: Is an order rejecting an application for review appealable? [Raj. J.S. 1998] Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [Is an order rejecting an application for review appealable?] Answer An order granting an application for review is appealable, but an order rejecting an application is not appealable. Sattemma v. Vishnu Murthy [AIR 1964… Read More »

Question: Is an order rejecting an application for review appealable? [Raj. J.S. 1998] Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [Is an order rejecting an application for review appealable?] Answer An order granting an application for review is appealable, but an order rejecting an application is not appealable. Sattemma v. Vishnu Murthy [AIR 1964 AP 162] No second appeal lies from an order made in the appeal from an order granting review. Order 47 Rule 7 states “7. Order...

Question: Is an order rejecting an application for review appealable? [Raj. J.S. 1998]

Find the answer to the mains question only on Legal Bites. [Is an order rejecting an application for review appealable?]

Answer

An order granting an application for review is appealable, but an order rejecting an application is not appealable. Sattemma v. Vishnu Murthy [AIR 1964 AP 162] No second appeal lies from an order made in the appeal from an order granting review.

Order 47 Rule 7 states

“7. Order of rejection not appealable. Objections to order granting the application

  1. An order of the Court rejecting the application shall not be appealable, but an order granting an application may be objected to at once by an appeal from the order granting the application or in an appeal from the decree or order finally passed or made in the suit.
  2. Where the application has been rejected in consequence of the failure of the applicant to appear, he may apply for an order to have the rejected application restored to the file, and, where it is proved to the satisfaction of the Court that he was prevented by any sufficient cause from appearing when such application was called on for hearing, the Court shall order it to be restored to the file upon such terms as to costs or otherwise as it thinks fit, and shall appoint a day for hearing the same.
  3. No order shall be made under sub-rule (2) unless notice of the application has been served on the opposite party.”

Important Mains Questions Series for Judiciary, APO & University Exams

  1. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – I of X
  2. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – II of X
  3. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – III of X
  4. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – IV of X
  5. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – V of X
  6. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – VI of X
  7. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – VII of
  8. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – VIII of X
  9. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – IX of X
  10. CPC Mains Questions Series: Important Questions Part – X of X
Updated On 2022-02-24T08:21:45+05:30
Admin LB

Admin LB

Next Story