Many states across the country have recently introduced new laws and regulations aimed at killing portions of a rapidly growing online gaming industry, including popular card games like poker and rummy. It is essentially the same argument put forth by every government. The laws introduced by Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh and regulations by Kerala are intended… Read More »

Many states across the country have recently introduced new laws and regulations aimed at killing portions of a rapidly growing online gaming industry, including popular card games like poker and rummy. It is essentially the same argument put forth by every government. The laws introduced by Tamil Nadu, Karnataka, and Andhra Pradesh and regulations by Kerala are intended to curb gambling.

It has now become necessary for the courts to intervene again. Some of the country’s largest gaming platforms, including the All-India Gaming Federation (AIGF), have challenged the laws passed by Tamil Nadu and Karnataka. Tamil Nadu’s highest court, the Madras High Court, struck down the law, while the Karnataka High Court has yet to rule.

Governments are concerned about gambling, yet the vast majority of instances involve rummy, not poker. Police in Andhra Pradesh nabbed a guy in September for stealing gold worth more than $300,000 from a bank in order to fund his online rummy addiction.

State regulations currently muddy the distinctions not only between games of skill and chance but also between different types of financial incentives. In truth, these regulations regard all financial stakes the same, whether they are intended to reward the winner of a game or a betting syndicate. There are several questions that comes in everyone’s mind when they think about card game like rummy and poker.

You can find your all answer on internet related rummy. In the end, you can decide on your own over playing card games.

The concerns

  1. All forms of gaming including wagering and betting are now prohibited under the Gaming Act
  2. It is unclear how such online gaming platforms may operate and be hosted in Karnataka under the Act.

Clarification in the law would be helpful.

The Supreme Court developed a test that determines whether online games are legal based on skill or chance. This test is not objective and has been applied differently by different courts. According to the Gujarat and Bombay High Courts, poker is a chance game. However, according to the Karnataka High Court, it is a skill game. The majority of modern-day games face similar ambiguity, except for online fantasy sports games.

Second, the observation was created many years ago and may need to be updated. For example, the Supreme Court stated that rummy is a skill game, but that it might be considered a chance game if it is played for money or if the game operators benefit. In a digital era where the country is home to dozens of gaming businesses, at least one gaming unicorn, and where citizens have easy access to stock and even cryptocurrency (another regulatory problem) trading platforms online, such a classification seems unusual.

Throughout the long term, courts have made endeavours to make an unmistakable differentiation between talent-based contests and shots in the dark. Taking into account that the courts have completed this activity after soundly deciphering the terms tosses of the dice and talent-based contests, through the Gaming Act, the Karnataka government puts the state’s economy at a backfoot, by forbidding any game which includes the demonstration of gambling cash and making the Act clearly subjective.

  • Administrative power

Next is the requirement for a position to screen administrative consistency. For OFS games, Niti Aayog has proposed a self-guideline by an SRO. An SRO could without a doubt give a compelling redressal component to gamers like the OTT system. Be that as it may, an SRO can’t practice legal powers and sort games into expertise versus possibility.

Also citing the success of similar mechanisms in the U.S. and Canada, the Niti Aayog has proposed a national safe-harbour for OFS skill games. However, it remains to be seen whether this system would work in India because, if regulations aren’t clear, game operators might be exposed to criminal proceedings (as one has seen for OTT platforms).

  • Gamer protection and safeguards

Other areas of concern include the lack of protection for gamers and protection against illegal activity. Several states have banned online games after gamers were exploited or lost their lives. These are not the only solutions, however. You can also limit the amount each player can bet. The Niti Aayog has proposed minimum age for gamers, fair terms and conditions for games, and disclaimers for advertising.

India’s online gaming sector is poised for massive growth with a set of clear and structured regulations in place.


  1. Law Library: Notes and Study Material for LLB, LLM, Judiciary and Entrance Exams
  2. Legal Bites Academy – Ultimate Test Prep Destination
Updated On 2022-02-21T08:16:48+05:30
Admin LB

Admin LB

Next Story