In response to an advertisement, the appellant along with the third respondent submitted a tender for running the University canteen at Patiala…… The third respondent’s writ was allowed by the single judge and an appeal was preferred by the writ appellant. Decide.

Last Updated on 1 year by Admin LB Question: In response to an advertisement, the appellant along with the third respondent submitted a tender for running the University canteen at Patiala. When tenders were opened, the offer of writ appellant to pay a monthly rent of Rs. 33,399 was the highest. The third respondent along with others was...